Studio · Full-screen workspace

Review Studio

The Review Studio is where a draft gets imported, marked up, rewritten and exported. Flag exact passages with margin comments, ask Iris to rewrite anchored sections in the document's voice, or run a panel of specialist review lenses before you ship.

An editing workspace, not an approval system. You can apply your own anchored comments or solicit AI specialist and simulated-stakeholder reads. Their verdict labels are review signals; they do not record a real person's approval or complete an external workflow.

Inline comments

Flag any passage with a margin note and a severity — note, concern or blocker.

Rewrites in your voice

Iris applies each comment as document prose, preserving your facts and register.

Review lenses

Specialists review from their domains; saved people can be simulated and are labeled sim.

Import & export

Bring PDF, Word, Markdown, HTML or rich text; export PDF, text, Markdown, HTML or a review bundle.

Open it any time — say "open the Review Studio", run /review in the composer, or click the Open chip — or jump straight back into a saved session.

What it is#

The Review Studio keeps the document, anchored comments and rewrites together. Export creates a file or clipboard result when you ask for one; the session does not maintain a separate export-history ledger. Comments are tied to real passages and stale anchors are held back from rewrite, so feedback cannot silently land on a paragraph that changed underneath it.

Bringing in a draft#

Start blank, paste rich text from Google Docs, or import PDF, Word, Markdown, HTML, plain text, or a previously exported .zimac-review bundle. Google Docs is a clipboard round-trip rather than direct document editing: paste its formatted content into Review, then copy the result back with formatting. You can also open the studio from chat, run /review, or ask Sage to hand a draft into it.

Try saying
open the Review Studio let's review this RFC /review

Flagging sections#

Select a passage and leave a margin comment on it — as specific as you like. Each comment carries a severity, so the important ones stand out from the nitpicks:

Note Concern Blocker

Comments are anchored to the exact text they mark, so they stay attached to the right spot as you work — and a comment whose anchor text has changed is held back from driving a rewrite until it's re-anchored, so feedback never lands on the wrong paragraph.

Try saying
flag this claim — is it actually true? mark the intro as a blocker: it buries the ask

Rewriting in your voice#

Once you've flagged what needs work, Iris rewrites only the flagged sections, applying each comment precisely. This is The Cut: remove drag without sanding off the author's identity. A rewrite is document prose, not a reply — it reads as if you wrote it in one sitting, flowing naturally from the paragraph before into the one after. So a comment that asks "is this true?" gets answered inside the narrative in the document's declarative voice, never with a question or a "here's a tighter version". Facts, numbers and names are preserved unless a comment says otherwise, and each rewrite stays roughly the length of the original unless you asked to expand or tighten.

It goes out under your name. Iris conditions the edit on your measured and curated voice when that profile is enabled, then matches the document's own register — not generic polished-assistant prose.
Try saying
apply my comments and rewrite those sections tighten the flagged paragraphs

A panel review#

When you want outside pressure on a draft, run a panel review: active specialists read it through their configured domain lens — Cassandra on data, Kai on rollout, Finn on cost, and so on. You can also choose saved people from People; those results are predictions generated from the saved profile and carry a visible sim badge. They are never represented as words, consent, or approval from the actual person. Each reviewer returns a review verdict and a one-line take:

Approve Concerns Block

Comments are verbatim-anchored to the passages they mark and kept tight. A verdict helps prioritize edits inside this session; it is not a signature, policy gate, stakeholder decision, or proof that the document is ready.

Try saying
get the team to review this design doc run a panel review on the migration plan
Want the team to write a document to convergence rather than review one you have? That's a commission — a heavier, opt-in gear. The Review Studio is for marking up a draft that already exists.

Saving & resuming#

Reviews save themselves. A session — the document, your comments, the rewrites — persists on its own, so you can park one mid-review and pick it back up later from the studio's list of saved sessions. Long documents and multi-pass edits don't have to happen in one go.

Try saying
open my saved reviews pick up the RFC review from yesterday

Exporting#

Export the clean document as PDF, plain text, Markdown, or standalone HTML; copy rich text for Google Docs; save a text copy in Zimac Documents; or export a .zimac-review bundle that preserves the document and its comments for a later Review Studio import. Copying for Google Docs does not publish or update a Google document automatically.